Introducing AgentPRD

Your customer interviews live in Fathom and Granola. Product docs sit in Google Drive. Support tickets pile up in Pylon and Zendesk. Feedback rots in spreadsheets. And when it's time to write a PRD, you open a blank document and start from memory.

We call this the Evidence Gap — the distance between what customers actually said and what ends up in your requirements.

We built AgentPRD to close it.

Why this matters now

Coding is becoming commodity. Claude Code, Cursor, and Codex can build features faster than most engineers can spec them. They're also getting better at writing implementation plans — they have full repo context, know every file, and catch edge cases humans miss. As models improve, the technical spec is becoming less important.

What matters now is the input: what to build, why, and for whom. PMs — not developers — are becoming the bottleneck. The PRD is the highest-leverage artifact in the entire product cycle. And most of them cite zero customer evidence.

How it works

1. Import your evidence — paste transcripts, upload files, forward emails, or connect Fathom and Granola directly
2. AI extracts insights — pain points, feature requests, and verbatim quotes are identified, tagged, and deduplicated across sources
3. Build your PRD — every requirement cites real customer voice with inline evidence. "4 of 6 users reported..." not "we believe..."
4. Share with agents — PRDs are structured for Claude Code, Cursor, and Codex to execute directly

No 40-page documents. No opinion-driven requirements. Every P0 traces to evidence.

Why we built this

We kept seeing the same pattern: PMs spend weeks collecting customer signal, then write PRDs that cite none of it. The evidence exists. It's just trapped in tools that don't talk to each other.

The result is broken PRDs — documents that satisfy a process but inform no decisions. Stakeholders debate opinions. Engineers build whatever survives the meeting. Nobody checks if requirements traced to user evidence.

What makes this different

Most PRD tools help you write faster. We help you write from evidence.

• Every requirement cites its source. Pain points get mention counts. Quotes get linked to transcripts. Assumptions get flagged explicitly.
• Weight by frequency. A pain point from 5 customers is a P0 candidate. A pain point from 1 is an assumption.
• Agent-ready output. Bullets, not prose. Acceptance criteria, not vague descriptions. What and why, never how — coding agents decide implementation.

What's next

We're in private beta, working with product teams who are tired of writing PRDs from memory. If that's you, get early access.

The era of opinion-driven PRDs is ending. What replaces it is simple: evidence in, requirements out, agents ship.